A5 webmaster network (www.admin5.com) October 10th news yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a judicial interpretation, clear the use of information from the media and other acts of network information to determine the extent of the fault and the extent of the problem.
yesterday, the Supreme People’s court held a trial against "on some issues of applicable law in civil disputes over human rights through information network the provisions" press conference, the "provision" is the specification of the trial against the right to network dissemination of information of civil disputes, for the use of the information network of slander and other criminal cases of judicial interpretation of the supreme law, legal questions on the Internet the introduction of a rule of adjudication. Will be implemented today (October 10th).
Supreme Court spokesman Sun Jungong said: in the main body of information dissemination, often from the media first sound, the impact of the traditional media to follow up. In the form of information dissemination, social media as the media, such as the spread of the two great influence. "Regulations" for the interpretation of these issues, clear the use of information from the media, such as the destruction of network information behavior and the degree of identification.
concern, since the media, big V forwarding need to be cautious
judicial interpretation of the provisions, the people’s court finds that the fault information behavior of network users or network service providers and network reprint, the following factors: the duty of care should be reproduced subject take its nature, influence scope to adapt; obvious degree of infringement of personal information reproduced his rights; whether the information to make modifications to reprint substantial, whether to add or modify the title of the article, the content and lead to serious discrepancies and the possibility to mislead the public. Yao Hui said that the identity of the person who is responsible for the removal of an important element is "fault", which requires the judge combined with evidence, combined with objective facts to make discretion and judgment.
, for example, you are ‘big V’, you should pay more attention to the network information than the average person." Yao Hui said, "if you are the ‘big V’, you should know that you easily forward, how much influence. You have a higher level of legal obligation. You should be careful."
two and paid delete posts, "Navy" post joint liability
the infringee reached with an infringement of the network user or network service provider party payment agreement, the other party to provide delete, shielding, broken links and other services, the people’s court shall be deemed invalid.
, delete, shielding unauthorized tampering with specific network information or to disconnect the link way to prevent others from access to network information, publish the information of the network users or network service providers to request the infringer to assume tort liability, the people’s court shall support. The principal and the trustee shall be jointly and severally liable for accepting the entrustment of the other party.
is employed, organized, abetted or helped others to publish or forward the network information to infringe upon the personal rights and interests of others, the infringer shall bear the joint and several liability, and the people’s court shall support it. < >
Powered By Impressive Business WordPress Theme